What
is dialogue?
A dialogue is not a debate, where points are scored and one side
wins. Those who participate seek, not to convert or persuade or
instruct their opposite numbers, but simply to get to know them
well and to understand and accept them in the fullness of their
differences. They are willing to reveal their true feelings and
views, to give a hearing to the ideas of others, and to air disagreements
frankly and fairly. In a successful dialogue, a great deal is learned,
but not so much through exchange of information as through the growth
of personal relationships. Opinion changes, if any, ill come spontaneously
out of the dialogue, not from lecturing or disputation.
SOME
USEFUL GUIDELINES
1. Make it your
business to know your own beliefs.
2. Do all
you can to understand the viewpoint of the people on the other
side.
3. Assume
that the others are speaking in good faith. Interpret their beliefs
and attitudes in the best possible light, not the worst.
4. Frankly
face issues that divide the two sides. Try to understand them;
don't pretend they don't exist.
5. Keep an
open mind; don't let your ideas about the other side get frozen
at any point.
6. Within
the limits of relevance, let the discussion go where it needs
to go. Don't try to decide in advance just where it should lead.
Another sound
rule is: Don’t claim too much for your own views. A great
many things in religious attitude and practice are matters of personal
choice. An acknowledgement that "I believe such-and-so, but
some of my co-religionists probably wouldn't agree" can save
much time that would otherwise be spent in internal squabbles.
Ignorance, frankly
acknowledged, is no disgrace. No one has all the answers. What you
don't know, someone else in the group may; what no one present knows
can be looked up and reported at the next session.
Finally, an
important reminder for everyone. Don't let your enthusiasm betray
you into monopolizing the conversation.

A COMPARISION OF DIALOGUE AND DEBATE
Dialogue
is collaborative: two or more sides work together towards common
understanding.
Debate is oppositional: two sides oppose each other and attempt
to prove each other wrong.
In dialogue,
finding common ground is the goal.
In debate, winning is the goal.
In dialogue,
one listens to the other's side(s) in order to understand, find
meaning, and find agreement.
In debate, one listens to the other side in order to find flaws
and to counter its arguments.
Dialogue
enlarges and possibly changes a participant's point of view.
Debate affirms a participant's own point of view.
Dialogue
causes introspection on one's own position.
Debate causes critique of the other position.
Dialogue
opens the possibility of reaching a better solution than any of
the original solutions.
Debate defends one's own positions as the best solution and excludes
other solutions.
Dialogue
creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong and
an openness to change.
Debate creates a closed-minded attitude: closed to being wrong or
to change.
In dialogue,
one submits one's best thinking, knowing that the other people's
reflections will help improve it rather than destroy it.
In debate, one submits one's best thinking and defends it against
challenge to show that it is right.
Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one's beliefs.
Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one's beliefs.
In dialogue,
one searches for basic agreements.
In debate, one searches for glaring differences.
In dialogue,
one searches for strength in the other positions.
In debate, one searches for flaws and weaknesses in the other position.
Dialogue
involves a real concern for the other person and seeks to not alienate
or offend.
Debate involves a countering of the other position without focusing
on feelings or relationship and often belittles or deprecates the
other person.
Dialogue
assumes that many people have pieces of the answer and that together
they can put them into a workable solution.
Debate assumes that here is a right answer and that someone has
it.
